What is the MOST suitable disaster recovery strategy for a nonprofit organization with limited funds that does not require immediate resumption of services after a disaster?

The most suitable disaster recovery strategy for a nonprofit organization with limited funds that does not require immediate resumption of services after a disaster is a cold site.

A cold site is an offsite location that has the necessary infrastructure to support a business's operations, but it does not have real-time data backups or hardware readily available. This approach is cost-effective as it requires minimal financial investment compared to other recovery options, making it suitable for organizations with limited budgets. Since this nonprofit does not need an immediate return to service, a cold site allows for a longer recovery time, utilizing resources on an as-needed basis to restore operations.

In contrast, a hot site provides a fully equipped and operational facility that can take over immediately, which comes at a high cost—something impractical for a budget-constrained organization. A warm site offers a middle ground, having infrastructure and data but may still require setup time, which isn't necessary for this scenario. Colocation involves housing multiple clients’ equipment in one location, generally providing redundancy and high availability; however, it can also be more expensive and is not tailored to the nonprofit's immediate needs or budget constraints.