How should a national park classify information about its flora and fauna posted on its website that does not contain sensitive data?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Excel in the Certmaster CE Security+ Domain 3.0 Security Architecture Assessment. Use interactive flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Be exam-ready with confidence!

Information about the flora and fauna of a national park that is publicly accessible on its website and does not contain sensitive data should be classified as public. This classification indicates that the information is intended for open access by anyone without restrictions. Such information typically includes species identification, conservation efforts, visitor information, and other educational content.

Classifying this information as public serves several purposes. It promotes transparency, enhances public awareness and education about biodiversity, and supports conservation efforts by making knowledge broadly available. Allowing access to this information can engage the community, encourage responsible tourism, and help protect natural resources through informed public participation.

In contrast, classifications such as internal, restricted, or confidential imply varying degrees of sensitivity and access limitations that are not appropriate for general information shared with the public. Internal would suggest it's meant for use within the organization only, restricted would limit access based on certain criteria, and confidential would indicate the presence of sensitive or proprietary information that should not be disclosed to the general public. Therefore, classifying this kind of information as public aligns with its intended use and accessibility.